Called to Order

 Mr. Joseph, Chair, called the meeting of the Tompkins County Legislature to order at 5:30 p.m.

Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag and Roll Call of Members

 Members and guests participated in the Pledge of Allegiance to the Flag.

 Present:  15 Legislators.

Reading by Tompkins County Poet Laureate

 Ms. Michelle Berry, Tompkins County Poet Laureate, spoke of her work this last year, which included working with schools, particularly middle schools, as well as participation in local events such as walkers for healthcare reform.  Ms. Berry thanked the Legislature for the ability to be Poet Laureate for the County, and the Community Arts Partnership for their support and work related to youth poetry and theatrical performances.

At this time Ms. Berry read several original poems.

Privilege of the Floor by the Public

 Michael Coles, Town of Lansing resident, stated he has been a State certified appraiser and evaluator for fifteen years and also evaluations.  He was at Office of Real Property Services for two years with Mr. Whicher.  He completed Tompkins County for speaking of the tax levy and not just the tax rate..  He spoke of his discussions to numerous municipalities relating to annual reassessment programs and is familiar with the issue.  He believes that assessments in Tompkins County are much like other areas of the country.  Mr. Coles does not agree with triennial assessment as it may appear to be a form of tax relief but isn’t.  He said assessment is not the issue, taxes are.  Mr. Coles urged the Legislature to stay with annual assessments as it is the fairest to all.

 Herb Engman, Town of Ithaca resident, voiced agreement with Mr. Coles and expressed a desire to continue with annual assessments.  He has followed the discussions and has found no reason to switch away from good public policy and does not see where a triennial assessment process would benefit property owners in the County.  In addition he expressed concern about the potential loss of State dollars that are presently awarded to the County for undertaking annual assessments.  He noted with changes to a thee-year assessment the County may fire some staff but hire more still in the third year.  He believes high assessments are not a problem, that it is positive when selling homes; taxes are the issue.  Mr. Engman believes rather than changing to triennial assessment a shift in taxes should occur.

 Cathy Valentino of the Town of Ithaca spoke of her experience preparing a budget as Supervisor for the Town of Ithaca and how concerns are raised when revenue decreases.  She reviewed the present funding received from the State for annual assessments and what the loss would be to the department if the assessment cycle were made triennial, and the cost of an annual assessment cycle with additional staff added, and how it would carry through to 2007.  Ms. Valentino did not see where any County tax dollars or constituent dollars would be saved by elimination of the annual assessment cycle and noted funds would need to be somehow brought in to make up any difference.

 Allen Lambert, Fall Creek resident, said he believed triennial assessment to be the most fair, with a net benefit, and community support.  He believes he has heard more discussion on a potential revenue loss rather than a benefit to the citizens.  Mr. Lambert said there will always be some inequity with regard to assessments, but that a triennial assessment would permit for a better averaging system in a volatile market.  He then shared his experience regarding assessment in his neighborhood and said he believes the process is flawed as the interior conditions of dwellings may be significantly different and should be taken into account.   He believes the Assessment Department does a good job but feels the tax burden is enormous and if not changed will result in the loss of families in various communities.

Presentation of the Distinguished Youth Award

 Mr. Shinagawa, District No. 4 Legislator, thanked Mr. Proto for his part in creating the Distinguished Youth Award Program, and presented the January 2006 Distinguished Youth Award to the I-Town S.T.O.M.P (students taking on mapping programs) Team, consisting of Casey Grey, Josh Hubble, Sharon Gami, and Chad Hamilton [Mentor Mike Smith].  This team undertook a project to identify community issues, set a goal, chose an action, contacted stakeholders, formulated an action plan, took action, evaluated the results, shared the information, and recognizing the efforts of all involved.  As a result of their work, it was determined there is a need for a youth-led Teen Center.

Privilege of the Floor by Legislators

 Ms. Herrera, District No. 5 Legislator, spoke of the upcoming Light in Winter events taking place this coming weekend.  These events are a marriage of art, science, and music.  She said this winter event is very exciting and stimulating, and that it provides not only County residents but tourists a wonderful opportunity.

 Ms. Kiefer, District No. 10 Legislator, reported on the recent visit to Henrietta, New York, by Ms. Herrera and herself to view a variety of voting machines that could possibly be recommended under the Help America Vote Act (HAVA).  She said the electronic touch-screen machines were not yet fully equipped to meet the requirements of HAVA, which the vendors explained by saying they are waiting for the State to specify the requirements.  But the group afforded the opportunity to see an optical scan machine paired with the automark machine designed for disabled individuals, which together should satisfy HAVA.  Ms. Kiefer said our Election Commissioners have not brought in machines locally as they are awaiting certification of machines by the State.  Ms. Kiefer said although the machines indicated they are state-of-the-art, she is not yet reassured that the new systems would operate properly.

 Mr. Proto, District No. 7 Legislator, reported that the Johnson Art Museum has been awarded a National Endowments for Humanities grant in the amount of one-half million dollars.  As a result of the grant and an additional 2 million dollars that was raised, the museum will be constructing a new north wing.  He anticipates additional construction work for local individuals as a result of this project.

 Mr. Koplinka-Loehr, District No. 11 Legislator, announced he would be attending the New York State Association of Counties Legislative Conference on January 31, 2006.

Mrs. McBean-Clairborne, District No. 2 Legislator, thanked her colleagues and residents of the County who participated in the Dr. Martin Luther King, Jr., Day events.  She enjoyed the speakers, especially Ms. Allen from New Orleans about the devastation from Hurricane Katrina, particularly the level of segregation regarding the level of funding and building that is occurring.  She asked that people bear this in mind and continue to offer donations.  Mrs. McBean-Clairborne then reported that Ms. Herrera received the Community Dispute Resolution Center Peace Maker Award on January 14, 2006; she noted that it was well deserved and she is proud of Ms. Herrera's work and receipt of the award.

Presentation of Resolution from the Government Operations Committee

 It was MOVED by Mrs. McBean-Clariborne, seconded by Ms. Robertson, and unanimously adopted by voice vote by members present, to lift the following resolution from the table for consideration.  RESOLUTION LIFTED FROM THE TABLE.

RESOLUTION NO. 271 - DIRECTING TOMPKINS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENT TO REVALUE REAL PROPERTY IN THE COUNTY IN THREE-YEAR INTERVALS

 It was MOVED by Mr. Koplinka-Loehr, seconded by Ms. Herrera, to amend the resolution by adding the following Resolved:

RESOLVED, further, That the Finance Director be authorized to appropriate $159,000 from the Contingent Fund to the Assessment Department's budget Account No. 1355.43089 in order to offset the loss of State aid resulting from the change to the three-year cycle,

 Ms. Robertson was provided clarification that if approved the Assessment Department would lose $159,000 in State aid in 2006.

 A voice vote on the motion to amend the resolution resulted as follows:  Ayes -  11; Noes - 4 (Legislators Booth, Joseph, Sigler, and Stevenson).  AMENDMENT CARRIED.

 Ms. Kiefer said she has a substitute resolution to offer; she indicated she would like to have discussions prior to offering it.

 Mr. Proto said a lot of information regarding one-year and three-year assessments has been provided.  He expressed appreciation to Mr. Shinagawa for the research and comments he provided to fellow Legislators and asked that Mr. Shinagawa speak about the impact on rural properties.

 Mr. Shinagawa shared information obtained from the New York State Office of Real Property Services that indicated when assessments are completed on a three-year cycle, rural properties do not shift as much as others.  He qualified this statement by conducting research on the New York State Office of Real Property Services website, discussions at previous meetings related to assessment, and a discussion with Mr. Franklin, Assistant Director of the County Assessment Office.  Based on his research and discussions, he indicated there are two ways that triennial assessments adversely effect rural properties:  (1) since urban areas have a tendency to have more sales transactions that increase property values, the rural property owner will be paying more toward the tax levy than they should as a result; and (2) in the event an assessment is completed in the urban area where high-volume sales are taking place, the shift to bring equality in the tax levy is done so by reducing the value of the rural property which places an inequity on the rural property owner when attempting to sell real estate.  Mr. Shinagawa also indicated that areas of the County such as Fall Creek and Belle Sherman that have a lot of sales will be assessed in the interim period and will have no benefit of the time period a triennial assessment cycle offers.

 Mr. Sigler said he believes the debate over this topic to be a good debate, not contentious as some may have indicated.  He agreed to an extent with Mr. Shinagawa's statements, yet he wonders why the County is stressing its employees to maintain an annual assessment cycle.  He pointed out that even though the County is on an annual cycle, some properties are revalued each year, while others are not due to the uniqueness of the property (lake property, rural, etc.).  He believes it comes down to comparable assessments and that there will not be many differences.  He believes if a one-year cycle is chosen adequate staffing is required.  He asked that a review of the letter from the New York State Office of Real Property Services to the Tompkins County Department of Assessment awarding $159,000 for the 2005 annual revaluation be done to determine if they are in agreement on all four points noted; if so, vote for one year.  Mr. Sigler does not fully agree with them and feels if the State desires one-year assessments it should be made permanent and appropriate funding provided.

 Mr. Randall thanked Ms. Coggin and her staff for their accessibility and information provided; and Mr. Shinagawa for his work as well.  He then indicated that during the campaign assessment was a key issue, and he like others championed the topic.  Mr. Randall said as a community member assumptions may be made based upon lack of or not enough information.  Subsequently he has conversed with assessment experts, who deal with the topic every day, and has become better informed.  He said his district is mainly rural and not considered an area to have high real estate sales, and would be hurt by triennial assessments and he will not support it.  He feels the Assessment Department does a great job, and is understaffed.  Mr. Randall believes individuals are not educated well to understand how to relate to government.

 Mr. Dennis expressed appreciation to the Assessment Department and Mr. Whicher for information relating to assessment.  He has had many individuals contact him regarding this issue and the majority indicated a preference for a three-year cycle.  With the knowledge he has learned he intends to support the triennial assessments.  He also appreciated Mr. Shinagawa's work that provided information that included the effects on rural properties as well.  He said people are just trying to get by financially.  He believes the real estate market will ultimately drive what people can sell their property for.  He will support the three-year cycle and feels it should be reviewed each year to determine how to best improve the process.

 Mr. Proto noted that at grievance days people ask what are the comparisons and he asked Mr. Whicher what type of education and information regarding the assessment process and comparable properties can be made available to residents.  Mr. Whicher said the Assessment Department would provide information to residents; he believes that if annual assessment is maintained there can be improvements on the level of information and comparables for residents.

 Mr. Joseph agreed this has not been a contentious debate but a long and difficult one due to the issue of one-year versus three-year assessments being closely matched.  If a three-year cycle, adjustments would be made, if a one-year cycle, not all can be completed.  He will support a three-year assessment cycle, primarily to decrease the amount of debate regarding an issue he believes to be driven by the tax rate rather than assessment cycle.

 Ms. Herrera believes that a moral difference exists between the one-year to three-year assessment cycles.   She said areas such as Fall Creek are no longer affordable to working families and those who are there can deal better with annual changes.  She recommends listening to people who complain to their representatives.  Ms. Herrera is not sure if a three-year assessment cycle will have fewer unfair assessments and feels any present problems may be due to a cuts.

 Mr. Booth was excused at this time (6:45 p.m.).

 Ms. Robertson thanked Mr. Randall for his thoughts and comments.  She then inquired what the anticipated increase in cost would be if annual assessment cycles were chosen and staffing brought to an adequate level.  Mr. Whicher noted the figure used by Supervisor Valentino was an estimate he provided if an additional appraiser and support staff position were added to the Assessment Department Staff.  Ms. Coggin indicated the $159,000 provided from the State for annual assessment requires the assessing unit to meet certain criteria to qualify, it is not automatic.  She said whether annual or triennial assessments were chosen it would require a repositioning of staff within the department.  If annual assessments were chosen, it would require hiring at last one staff member, most likely a data collector with an approximate cost of $29,000 plus benefits for a total approximate cost of $50,000 the first year.  This would mean of the $159,000, $109,000 would be left to offset local operating costs.  Ms. Robertson did not feel it that just adding one data collector seemed realistic, given what she has heard about the workload.  Ms. Coggin said that the staff had been pushed hard the last several years.  If the market continues to increase there could be a need for an appraiser as well for a total additional cost of $75,000, making to total for additional staff $125,000 to stay with annual assessments.

 Ms. Mackesey said trying to determine a fair way of doing things is difficult; annual assessments provide aspects that are appealing; however, with the way the market values have been within the county it is difficult to know what the future holds.   In her discussions with constituents there was anxiety expressed over the assessment issue.  She is not certain that if the County went to a triennial assessment that would not be distortions, however, she feels it is important to listen to constituents.   If a one-year assessment cycle were chosen she would support additional staff; however, she is in support of a three-year assessment cycle.

 Ms. Kiefer spoke of Ms. Mackesey's comments regarding taxpayer anxiety.  She believes it is an anxiety regarding taxes rather than assessment and taxies is what the Legislature should focus on, rather than changing the assessment cycle.  Ms. Kiefer noted the Assessment Department has done a good job of providing formal and informal meetings to clarify the differences between assessment and tax levy.   She spoke of the reasons individuals gave to remain with annual assessment, the memo referred to from the New York State Office of Real Property Services, and feels that communication is good.  With regard to grievance days, she noted they are informal at that point, and also stated that individuals who feel it is important may invite assessors into their homes.

 It was MOVED by Ms. Kiefer, seconded by Ms. Herrera, to offer the following substitute resolution:

RESOLUTION NO.         - DIRECTING TOMPKINS COUNTY DEPARTMENT OF ASSESSMENT TO REVALUE REAL PROPERTY IN THE       COUNTY IN ONE-YEAR INTERVALS

 WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 270 of 2005 the Tompkins County Legislature adopted a local law providing that real property in the County shall be revalued at a uniform percentage of fair market value and reviewed by the professional appraiser staff of the Department of Assessment at time periods determined by resolution of the County Legislature, and
 WHEREAS, the County Legislature believes that continuing with a time period of one year serves the best interest of the County and its residents, now therefore be it
 RESOLVED, on recommendation of the Government Operations and the Budget and Capital Committees, That all property in the County of Tompkins shall be revalued at a uniform percentage of fair market value and reviewed by the professional appraisers staff of the Department of Assessment annually.
SEQR ACTION:  TYPE II-20

___________________

 Mr. Shinagawa said although it is unsettling to get assessment notices, a triennial cycle will not prevent this from occurring and asked how often this could occur.  Ms. Coggin said notices would be sent annually as changes occur, that it would be the same as with the annual cycle, however adjustments to the 100 percent would occur.  Mr. Shinagawa asked if it were possible to indicate how the past three years would have been handled if on a three-year cycle and was informed it is difficult to have projected as many factors are considered in a single assessment.  Mr. Shinagawa said he believes people are under a misconception that a triennial cycle will eliminate annual notices, residents think they will have relief when in fact it does not occur.

 Mr. Hattery thanked the City Legislators for pointing out what may occur with slower moving rural properties.  He feels it is important to deal with administrative reform to cut costs; that it should be moved on and not assume changes in assessment will change tax bills.  He is not in support of a three-year cycle as he believes the issue is County spending, not the schedule of assessments.  Mr. Hattery would like to seek ways to reduce costs and develop a policy to make it easier to structure and file a grievance.

 Mr. Koplinka-Loehr spoke of a survey of other counties by New York State Association of Counties that indicated Tompkins County is not alone regarding this issue.  He stated twelve counties that do three-year assessments have indicated they are contemplating a switch to an annual assessment program, to give relief – or the illusion of relief.

 Ms. Robertson did not feel funding for a three-year cycle would be eliminated.  She will support a three-year cycle, noting residents frustration and anxiety of receiving an annual letter.

 A voice vote on the motion to approve the substitute resolution resulted as follows:  Ayes - 7 (Legislators Hattery, Herrera, Kiefer, Koplinka-Loehr, Proto, Shinagawa, and Randall); Noes - 7 (Legislators Dennis, Joseph, Mackesey, McBean-Clairborne, Robertson, Sigler, and Stevenson); Excused - 1 (Legislator Booth).  MOTION FAILED.

 It was MOVED by Mr. Proto to amend the original resolution by adding an additional resolved as follows:

 RESOLVED, further, That the Assessment Department will move to review the grievance process with the intent of expediting it.

 There was no second to the motion.  MOTION FAILED FOR LACK OF SECOND.

 A brief discussion occurred relating to the possibility of a tie vote.  It was explained the resolution would require eight votes to pass.  Mr. Whicher noted the Legislature needed to determine the course of action for the Assessment Department immediately in order to properly carry out their duties.

 A roll call vote on the original resolution resulted as follows:  Ayes - 7 (Legislators Dennis, Joseph, Mackesey, McBean-Clairborne, Sigler, Stevenson, and Robertson); Noes - 7 Legislators Hattery, Herrera, Kiefer, Koplinka-Loehr, Proto, Randall, and Shinagawa); Excused - 1 (Legislator Booth).  RESOLUTION FAILED.

 WHEREAS, by Resolution No. 270 of 2005 the Tompkins County Legislature adopted a local law providing that real property in the County shall be revalued at a uniform percentage of fair market value and reviewed by the professional appraiser staff of the Department of Assessment at time periods determined by resolution of the County Legislature, and
 WHEREAS, the County Legislature believes that a time period of three years serves the best interest of the County and its residents, now therefore be it
 RESOLVED, on recommendation of the Government Operations and the Budget and Capital Committees, That all property in the County of Tompkins shall be revalued at a uniform percentage of fair market value and reviewed by the professional appraisers staff of the Department of Assessment at three-year time intervals.
SEQR ACTION:  TYPE II-20

___________________

 A discussion occurred regarding the need to resolve the assessment issue.  It was noted that it would require the full Legislature to be present and that a meeting date would be set to act upon the matter.

Report from a Municipal Official

 There was no municipal official(s) in attendance at this time.

Chair’s Report

 Mr. Joseph, Chair, did not have a report.

Report from the County Administrator

 Mr. Whicher provided members of the Legislature with emergency contact numbers for staff.  He said in all the time he has worked for the County he views the discussions relating to assessment was the best debate, although the toughest one.  Mr. Whicher reported the search has begun for a Deputy County Administrator.  Members of the Search Committee are Tim Joseph, Anita Fitzpatrick, Schelley Nunn, Patricia Carey, David Squires, Norma Jayne, and himself.  He hopes to have a final appointment determined by early April.

Report from the County Attorney

 Mr. Wood did not have a report.

Report from the Finance Director

 Mr. Squires did not have a report.

Addition of Resolution(s) to the Agenda

 There were no resolution(s) added to the agenda.

Withdrawal of Resolution(s) from the Agenda

 There were no resolutions withdrawn from the agenda.

Approval of Resolution(s) Under the Consent Agenda

 There were no resolutions under the Consent Agenda.

Approval of Appointment(s) Under the Consent Agenda

 There were no appointments under the Consent Agenda.
 
Report from the Personnel Committee

 Mr. Dennis, Chair, reported the Committee met January 11, 2006, and was provided a presentation from Ms. Fitzpatrick, Commissioner of Personnel, and Mr. Estes, Deputy Commissioner of Personnel, on the organization and the function of the Personnel Department.  He requested any Legislator having a personnel issue that needs review to submit it to Mrs. Covert to enable the Personnel Committee to discuss the matter.  Mr. Dennis said some of the issues previously covered by the Workforce Diversity and Inclusion Committee will be handled in the Personnel Committee.  He expressed appreciation to Ms. Fitzpatrick and Mr. Estes for the fine work in presenting material to the Committee.

Report from the Government Operations Committee

 Ms. Herrera, Chair, reported the Committee had a special meeting on January 10, 2006, to discuss the information received and answer questions related to the assessment cycle resolution presented this evening.  The next meeting will be on January 18, 2006, at which time a report will be heard on the voting machines viewed by Ms. Kiefer and herself as well as a variety of other topics.  Ms. Herrera said if any Committee has questions regarding policies they should notify her so the Committee can address the issue.

Report from the Library Committee

 Mr. Joseph, Chair, reported the Library Committee met on January 12, 2006, and started the process of what are the issues between the County and the Library.  He said everyone agreed it was a good discussion.  On January 27, 2006, the Committee will meet again to discuss services provided and how best to make a budget presentation that provides the Legislature real choices about Library services.

Report from the Budget and Capital Committee

 Mr. Koplinka-Loehr, Chair, reported the Committee met January 9, 2006, at which time they reviewed the processes for the new Legislators.  In addition, at the meeting Mr. Hattery was named liaison to the Tompkins Cortland Community College.  Mr. Koplinka-Loehr said at the January 23, 2006, meeting the tutorial of the budget process will continue and include information on things such as the fiscal target.  He also reported that as budget setting is tied to planning, the annual budget retreat is set for Thursday, April 27th, with the tentative time of 6:00  p.m. - 9:00 p.m.

Report from the Strategic Planning Committee

 Mr. Koplinka-Loehr, Chair, said there was a meeting with Department Heads.  The topic of initiatives over the past five to ten years was discussed, and in particular, how does the Legislature respond and where should they be taken.  It was determined that a meeting between Department Heads and Administration take place to sort out communication issues, trust, etc.   This meeting will occur on February 1, 2006.

Report from the Public Safety Committee

 Mrs. McBean-Clairborne, Chair, did not have a report.   The Committee will meet on February 2, 2006.

Report from the Workforce Diversity and Inclusion Committee

 Mrs. McBean-Clairborne, Chair, did not have a report. The Committee will meet on January 25, 2006.

Report from the Health and Human Services Committee

 Mr. Proto, Chair, said the first Committee meeting will take place on January 31, 2006.  He reported that on January 28, 2006, the Human Rights Commission will hold its annual dinner; on January 26, 2006, a Better Housing Training Session will take place at the Ramada Inn to discuss the business of municipal officials and tools for affordable housing; and that a FEMA grant of almost $36,000 had been received at the Human Services Coalition which will be distributed to the appropriate agencies in the near future.

Report from the Facilities and Infrastructure Committee

 Mr. Randall, Chair, said the Committee will meet on January 24, 2006.

Report and Presentation of Resolution(s) from the Planning, Development and Environmental Quality Committee

 Ms. Robertson, Chair, said the Committee met briefly prior to the meeting to address the resolution being presented.  The Committee will meet on January 19, 2006, and she extended an invitation to new members of the Legislature to attend a portion of the meeting relating to department/agency reporting. In addition, discussions will take place related to possible amendments to the Beautification Grants process.

RESOLUTION NO. 5 - APPOINTMENTS TO INDUSTRIAL DEVELOPMENT AGENCY

  MOVED by Ms. Robertson, seconded by Mr. Dennis.

 It was MOVED by Mr. Proto, seconded by Mr. Randall, to nominate Jean McPheeters to the position of Chair of the Industrial Development Agency.

 Ms. Robertson stated this nomination was also made at the Committee meeting and failed by a 3-2 vote.  She spoke of Mr. Joseph's leadership ability and the importance of his leadership during this year when issues regarding the City density policy will be present.  She believes Mr. Joseph to be the best choice.  In addition, she said the Industrial Development Agency is a County agency and it is appropriate to have a County representative in the position; she does not believe it would be appropriate for an individual representing private businesses to be fill the position.

 Mr. Proto stated his nomination was in no way disrespectful to Mr. Joseph.   He said he has worked with Ms. McPheeters in a number of capacities and knows her level of involvement at both the State and Federal levels as well as her exposure locally with the Board of Cooperative Education Services (BOCES).  Mr. Proto believes she brings a countywide perspective as well as a business perspective, and would provide exemplary leadership in a number of areas.  Mr. Proto stated he did not have a recollection that the Chair of the Industrial Development Agency was recommended by a Standing Committee such as Planning, Development and Environmental Quality; that the Legislature is the body who appoints a Chair.  Mr. Joseph indicated past appointments have been done in the same fashion as the resolution before the Legislature.

 In response to Mr. Sigler's question, it was noted that the recommended individuals not on the Legislature were Ms. McPheeters, Mr. Cogan, and Mr. Furman.

 Mr. Dennis said in most other situations he could support the recommendation of Ms. McPheeters, however, his sense is that Mr. Joseph has done a fine job as a leader and he will support him.

 At this time Mr. Proto requested and was granted permission to withdraw his motion.  MOTION WITHDRAWN.

 A voice vote on the resolution as presented resulted as follows:  Ayes - 13; Noes - 1 (Legislator McBean-Clairborne); Excused - 1 (Legislator Booth).  RESOLUTION ADOPTED.

 WHEREAS, Section 856 of the General Municipal Law authorized that the Tompkins County Legislature designate the members of Industrial Development Agency by resolution, now therefore be it
 RESOLVED, on recommendation of the Planning, Development and Environmental Quality Committee, That the following members be appointed to the Industrial Development Agency to serve at the pleasure of the Board, effective immediately:
 Kathy Luz Herrera - Member, Tompkins County Legislature (City representative)
 Tim Joseph - Member, Tompkins County Legislature (Rural representative)
 Mike Hattery - Member, Tompkins County Legislature (Rural representative)
 Martha Robertson - Member, Tompkins County Legislature (Rural representative)
 Jeff Furman - At-large member
 Dan Cogan - At-large member
 Jean McPheeters - Tompkins County Area Development Board of Directors representative
 RESOLVED, further, That Tim Joseph serve as the Chair of the Industrial Development Agency,
 RESOLVED, further, That the Clerk of the Legislature is authorized and directed to file with the Secretary of State a Certificate of Appointment.
SEQR ACTION:  TYPE II-20

_____________________

Approval of Minutes

 It was MOVED by Mrs. McBean-Clairborne, seconded by Mr. Koplinka-Loehr, and unanimously adopted by voice vote by members present, to approve the minutes of January 3, 2006.  MINUTES APPROVED.

Adjournment

 On motion, at 7:45 p.m., the meeting adjourned on a day-to-day basis.

Respectfully submitted: Karen Fuller, Deputy Clerk