Staff:     R. Nicholas, Airport Manager; C. Nelson, Public Works Administrator; J. Lampman, Highway Division; D. Squires, Finance Director; A. LeMaro, Facilities; K. Fuller, Recorder,

Guests: M. J. Bauer, C. Grigorov

1)  Called to Order

 Mr. Penniman called the meeting to order at 2:02 p.m.
 
2)  Additions to and Deletions from the Agenda

 The following items were added:

· Report on the Purchase of Grade-All - Highway Division
· Asbestos mitigation - Biggs B

3)  Persons to Address the Committee

 The individuals wishing to speak will do so during the topic discussion later in the meeting.

4) Chair's Report

Mr. Penniman did not have a report.  He requested that the Highway and Facilities Division periodic reports be presented as separate documents.

5)  Minutes of February 17, 2005
 
 By consensus, the minutes were tabled until the April meeting.

6)  Highway Division Organization

Mr. Marx provided a flowchart that outlined the 2005 organization of the Highway Division.  He explained this simplified organizational design that provides for an engineering group, shop maintenance group, and the construction/maintenance (field) group.  The construction maintenance group will have three crews who will report to supervisors and senior crew supervisor.  Mr. Lampman will oversee the engineering group and will generate plans, specifications, and quality control/assurance for the division's construction projects as well as managing the Federal aid programs, consultants, and contractors for those contracted for.  The shop maintenance group will be the same as it presently is, headed by Mr. Gregrow and it is for the maintenance of the equipment.  The construction/maintenance group will be responsible for road maintenance/construction in the summer and snow/ice removal in the winter.  There will be three crews in the summer, each with a supervisor, and a senior crew supervisor, Mr. Whittemore, who will oversee the operation in the field.

Mr. Marx informed the Committee that until a Highway Manager is hired, the responsibilities of the position wils be split between Ms. Nelson and Mr. Lampman.  Ms. Nelson, Public Works Administrator will manage non-technical areas such as personnel, budget, accounting, and payroll.  Mr. Lampman will manage the technical and engineering responsibilities of the division.  Both Ms. Nelson and Mr. Lampman report to Mr. Marx in the interim period.  Mr. Lampman will continue as acting Highway Manager at this time as well as heading the engineering group.  Mr. Marx said each leader will report to the Highway Manager as well as interact with the administration office.  Ms. Kiefer inquired about the long-anticipated combining of public works administrative staff and was informed by Mr. Marx that it had been reviewed and while certain projects cross divisional lines and are headed by Ms. Nelson, it was believed best to maintain the separate administration functions in divisions.

7)  Highway Manager Revised Job Description

 Mr. Marx reviewed the amended job description as previously discussed.  Mr. Winch inquired if there is flexibility regarding the level of salary, noting the salary level may determine whether a qualified individual would be willing to accept the position without additional compensation.  Mr. Marx indicated the position is currently under review by the Commissioner of Personnel; if an individual is not willing to accept the position at this level of salary there may be options available.  Mr. Winch said he believes there is a need to reduce the length of time between interviews and offering the position to an individual as well as the need to have the ability to negotiate if a person is qualified and unable to accept the position at the current level of approximately $68,000.  Ms. Kiefer noted the most significant change was the elimination of the engineering requirement making the position more administrative in nature.  Mr. Marx said he is aware that the individual would not be responsible for  this year's planned construction, however it will be worthwhile to bring the individual on to provide knowledge of the County operations as well as be present during the 2006 budget process.
 
 The Committee, by consensus, recommended proceeding with the hiring process for this position.

8)  Approval to Seek Bids and Level of Committee Involvement - Roller - Highway Division

  Mr. Gregrow reported that it is anticipated that the cost will be $97,000 with trade-in of the old equipment.  Mr. Winch said he would like to see the summary of the bids prior to ordering the equipment.  Ms. Schuler said the Town of Ithaca Supervisor said they ordered all trucks in red as it saves cost.  Mr. Gregrow said that the County purchases the stock color of equipment and vehicles and repaints as necessary.  The Committee came to consensus to review the bids prior to awarding the bid.

9)  Update - Grade-All Purchase

 Mr. Gregrow reported that the 2004 Grade-All has been received and is in service.  By purchasing a used piece of equipment with 500 hours of operation at a cost of $234,000 the County saved $25,000; the equipment has a full warranty on the vehicle as if new.

10)  Highway and Bridge Project Status Report

Members reviewed the Highway and Bridge Status Report and noted the following:

· Warren Road - A meeting has taken place with the consultants working for the Forest Home Improvement Association, and included Emergency Services Personnel, and Highway Department staff.  The consultant recommendations were reviewed and it is thought the designs are problematic due to the road being designated as arterial.  As a portion of this road is scheduled during this construction season, work will continue with the Town of Ithaca to come to an appropriate conclusion.  Mr. Winch cautioned that safety measures be adhered to during the design of the construction.  Mr. Lampman noted the funding is local; it was not certain if the consultant's recommendations took into consideration the functional classification of the road.  Ms. Kiefer spoke of the public meeting, stating she believes the FHIA is aware that the final determination of construction design will be made by the Town and County.
· McLean-Cortland Road - is ready for the bidding process.  One easement has been obtained.
· Ringwood Road - the proposed detour is approximately six miles long; feasibility of an on-site detour is being undertaken to see if the distance can be reduced.  To do an on-site detour the cost would depend on whether a culvert is used versus a temporary bridge.  Upon viewing recent bridge construction the residents seemed to be satisfied with their appearance.
· Stevens Road Bridge - the work has now begun.
· Newfield Depot - a public meeting will be held on March 22.
· Hanshaw Road - approximately sixty individuals attended the meeting; Ms. Kiefer said the public did not seem to like breaking into small groups.  She suggested residents be allowed to make statements before breaking into groups.
· A request was made that dates for all public meetings be checked with local Legislators for availability.
· Coddington Road - is a collector road; petitions have been received requesting travel lanes be only nine feet with four-foot shoulders.  Normally, the width of roads would not be reduced.  Typical travel lanes on county roads are 10 feet; to reduce it to 9 feet would be contrary to the standards presently used.  The funding through the State process allows consideration regarding the context of the road itself to allow for the least disruption of neighborhoods; however, safety is the first concern.  Mr. Winch expressed concern that a reduced width could cause an accident when full-width legal loads of 8.5 feet come by each other at legal speeds on a 9-foot road.  Mr. Lampman said the present roadway is 10 feet per lane.  Ms. Winch noted that during other projects the County worked with the Town and recommends the same process take place regarding specific shoulder and sidewalk requests; Mr. Lampman said the shoulder treatment is determined by the County, sidewalks are specific to the local municipality.

11)  Persons Wishing To Address the Committee - Coddington Road Residents

Carolyn Grigorov, Coddington Road resident, spoke of the Coddington Road project.  She is concerned what the overall width of the road would be and how much land would be taken to do so.  She believes it is an "as of use" road and feels it should be sufficient to make repairs without widening the road.  In addition, Ms. Grigorov feels it is appropriate to have sidewalks on the portion of the road that would include from the City line to the bus stops along the road.  She said that although it is a collector road she does not believe there is sufficient truck traffic to warrant widening the road as well as the possibility of increasing the speed of travel due to a wider lane.

Merry Jo Bauer, Coddington Road resident, said the original plan for 11-foot wide lanes and 5-foot wide shoulders was not appropriate for this road.  She said at the public meeting it was thought by a staff member that to reduce the lane width from 11 feet it would require a waiver from the Federal government.  Mr. Lampman said if in the design report something was thought to be substandard it would require justification for the County's proposal, with a final determination being made by staff at the Federal level.  He thought the 10-foot lane would be acceptable at the northern end of the project but it will require State approval.  Ms. Bauer said the 10-foot lane would be acceptable; however, of those interviewed and those signing petitions it was clear that the residents do not desire a change in the road width.  Mr. Lampman said a review of the accident history indicates the width of the road it not a contributing factor, it may be possible to maintain the present width.

Ms. Grigorov inquired about the homes that are listed with Historic Preservation and was advised that State Historic Preservation Office (SHPO) requires a review of the design to determine whether the project may have an adverse effect on the historical properties.  If it is determined the design would have an adverse effect, the plan must be revised or submitted for a more intensive review. Ms. Grigorov said she believes 14 houses come into this category.

Mr. Penniman said he has seen vehicles speed on County roads that are wide, flat, and straight; and also noted a rough shoulder assists to signify driving off the road, but it encourages bicycles and even baby strollers to travel in the main roadway.

Mr. Marx said when designing a major rebuild of a road it does not encompass just the immediate need but also looks to the future.  Additionally, there will be a meeting tomorrow regarding the project and will look at the land use along roads to determine where bicycle/pedestrian lanes are warranted.  He believes that parameters may be developed to determine standards based on specific density and proximity of neighborhoods.

Ms. Schuler asked if the traffic pattern on Coddington Road has changed due to the Burns Road construction.  Mr. Lampman did not feel it was significant.  Ms. Shuler then said residents expressed concerned that work may be done without prior notification.  Mr. Lampman said the public meeting included notification that several notifications to residents will be forthcoming including a review of final design and notification prior to work on immediate property.

Ms. Kiefer inquired if there was a preference which side of the road a sidewalk be placed and was told there is none.

Mr. Lampman said all accident, traffic, and property information to review and draw a plan for the reconstruction with various alternatives.  It is anticipated another public meeting will take place in May and June.  Following this meeting a final plan will be developed and presented.  Traffic counts have been completed that include the number of vehicles and the speed traveled.  Ithaca College will be contacted to determine their role and future plans for property they own.

12)  Highway and Bridge Project Status Report - Continued

· Warren Road - Borg Warner has been contacted and will be included in meetings related to the project.
· Freight Study - Peruville Road was the main area discussed.  It appears that the State Department of Transportation is adamant that any Federal Aid road must be open to all traffic.
· Station Road - a meeting will take place on March 24th.  There will be a long detour during this construction; the fire department has developed a plan to cover areas during this time.

13) RESOLUTION NO.  - URGING INCREASED FUNDING FOR THE NEW YORK STATE CONSOLIDATED HIGHWAY IMPROVEMENT PROGRAM (CHIPs)

 MOVED by Mr. Winch, seconded by Ms. Schuler, and unanimously approved by voice vote, to submit the following resolution to the full Legislature for approval.  Ms. Kiefer inquired if it is known what the particular index in the second RESOLVED is.  It is unknown at this time what specific index it may be.
 
WHEREAS, local governments are responsible for eighty five percent of the state’s 110,000 miles of roadways, and are also responsible for fifty percent of the state’s 18,000 bridges, and
  WHEREAS, the Governor’s New York State Executive Budget 2005-2006 proposes funding for the program remain flat at the 2004-05 level of $35M in County/NYC Consolidated Highway Improvement Funds (CHIPs), and
  WHEREAS, the proposed 2005/06 Executive Budget Proposal proposes no increase for CHIPs funding to account for the dramatic inflationary increases in the cost of fuel, equipment and material, and
  WHEREAS, the 2004/05 adopted state budget restored the $35 million in county/New York City CHIPs funding, and
  WHEREAS, because of the restored funds, county highway departments were able to repair important components of the local transportation system, and purchase necessary highway equipment and materials, and
  WHEREAS, CHIPs is a unique form of a block grant in transportation financing providing critical transportation funding to over 1,600 units of local government in New York State, now therefore be it
RESOLVED, on recommendation of the Facilities and Infrastructure Committee, That the Tompkins County Legislature hereby goes on record urging the State Legislature to support a $100 Million increase to bring the CHIPs funding level to parity with today’s increased costs, and
RESOLVED, further, That the Tompkins County Legislature urges the state to index these funds as part of the state’s multi-year capital plan so that local governments can budget and properly plan to address the deficiencies in the local transportation system, and
 RESOLVED, further, That certified copies of this resolution be forwarded to Governor George E. Pataki, the New York State Legislature, and all others deemed necessary and proper.
SEQR ACTION: TYPE II - 20

CHIPs once had both capital and O&M allocations.  O&M funds are now rolled into capital, though there have been efforts to cut that funding entirely.  With the exception of one year when that cut did occur, Tompkins County has received $1.29 million annually for six years.  In past years, this funded 100% of the highway materials budget.

14)  RESOLUTION NO.    - URGING AN INCREASE IN CRITICAL MARCHISELLI HIGHWAY AND BRIDGE FUNDING
 
 MOVED by Mr. Todd, seconded by Ms. Kiefer, and unanimously approved by voice vote, to submit the following resolution to the full Legislature for approval.
 
WHEREAS, the Marchiselli Funding Program is the State component of a successful Federal, State, and Local partnership delivering transportation improvements on the local highway system, and
WHEREAS, the Federal Transportation Program has grown over the past five years, and the number of Federal Aid projects sponsored by local governments has increased over the past five years, and
WHEREAS, Marchiselli Funding has not increased in the past five years, and
WHEREAS, the Marchiselli program has not kept pace with the Federal Transportation Program resulting in delays of State matching funds or eligible portions of projects not receiving State matching funds, and
WHEREAS, the Governor’s executive Budget submission to the legislature holds Marchiselli funding static at $40 million, now therefore be it
RESOLVED, on recommendation of the Facilities and Infrastructure Committee, That the Tompkins County Legislature strongly urges the State Legislature to increase this critical funding to a level consistent with the level of locally sponsored projects listed on the current Statewide Transportation Improvement Program (STIP), and
RESOLVED, further, That the Tompkins County Legislature strongly urges the Governor and State Legislature to increase Marchiselli program funding to $80 million to match the current need during the 2005 legislative session, and
  RESOLVED, further, That certified copies of this resolution be forwarded to Governor George E. Pataki, the New York State Legislature, and all others deemed necessary and proper.
SEQR ACTION: TYPE II - 20

Explanatory Note: This resolution is suggested as part of the NYS County Highway Superintendents’ Association’s “Local Roads Matter!” legislative campaign.  For federal aid highway and bridge projects, Marchiselli funding is designed to furnish 15% of reimbursable project costs, leaving the County with a 5% share.  However, the state has not appropriated enough money for the statewide need, making Marchiselli aid unavailable for some projects.  In Tompkins County, no Marchiselli aid has been allocated to date for design of Warren Road reconstruction in Lansing or the Station Road culvert in West Danby and only about one third of the need is currently available for Coddington Road in the Town of Ithaca.  (Funding is requested again for the 05-06 state budget.)  To date, past projects lacked $32,000 of Marchiselli funding that was made up from local funds.  NYSDOT recommends the County assume a 20% local share will be required for future projects if funding remains flat.

And flat funding is proposed, not only for 05-06, but also throughout a 5-year state transportation planning cycle that begins this fiscal year.  No increases are proposed in what is called the “Core Capital Program.”  An “Enhanced Investment Program” is also proposed, as well as reinstatement of a Multi-Modal Aid Program.  Both could be used to supplement local transportation programs.

15)  Approval to Seek Bids and Level of Committee Involvement - Brooktondale Bridge Rehabilitation
 
 The Committee was informed this is for a two-barrel concrete culvert bridge.  Mr. Lampman noted the radius at the far side of the bridge would be redesigned to allow for heavy construction vehicles that utilize the bridge to have access and egress from University Sand and Gravel.  Ms. Kiefer felt a diagram showing changes would be helpful when dealing with the public.  The Committee approved seeking bids and requested they be brought back in the form of a resolution for Committee approval.

16)  Approval to Seek Bids and Level of Committee Involvement - McLean-Cortland Road Reconstruction

 This is the second phase of the reconstruction.  It was explained that it included the replacement of the bridge that will be done in stages to allow for one lane of traffic through the area.  If construction can begin in May 2005 it is anticipated to be complete during the construction season.  The bridge may not be fully completed until spring of 2006 due to the manner it is being rebuilt.  Mr. Lampman noted the bridge had been rebuilt in the 1970's using materials recycled from the 1930's.  The Committee approved seeking bids and requested they be brought back in the form of a resolution for Committee approval.

Mr. Penniman requested a status report on the 2005 work plan.  Mr. Lampman said it is in the final planning stages and the Committee will receive a copy upon completion.  Mr. Penniman requested the color-coded printout of the work plan.

 The Committee held a recess from 3:30 p.m. to 3:40 p.m.

17)  Public Works/Planning Commissioner Position

The Committee briefly discussed the topic of the combined Public Works/Planning Commissioner proposal.  Mr. Marx said it may be brought to all Committees in April, or possibly to the entire Legislature as a whole to save time attending multiple meetings.   Consensus of the Committee was to set this item on a Legislature agenda for approximately one-half hour of discussion.

18) Vehicular-Accident Mapping

Mr. Potter, Information Technology Department head, spoke to the Committee on the topic of vehicular accident mapping.  As he has been involved with collection of these data and this present use, Mr. Potter wished to explain some of the problem areas that exist.  It was explained by Mr. Penniman that if the information on accident and traffic patterns on all roads be available it could assist in decision making when planning reconstruction of the County's highways.  Mr. Potter said the accident data he has seen to date have been derived by the State Police through the use of a specific form that provides a standard method for input.  In Tompkins County there are multiple agencies; a standard format is required by the State to be completed but there is no requirement to provide detail to accurately map the accident.  In addition, he explained that the lack of mobile data communication ability in patrol cars has also eliminated the ability to collect data.  In the past each patrol car could provide the GPS mapping data at the time they arrived at the traffic stop or accident scene.  Mr. Potter said the last several days he has been working to develop a manner to improve communication between the sheriff's department and dispatchers to provide location information as accuratly as possible.

Mr. Potter said at this time he is working with the Sheriff's office and dispatchers to replace software mapping programs to one called Looking Glass.  It is a non-proprietary program that will allow migration of the GPS data previously collected.  This is expected to assist in location identification that can be provided to officers in the field as well as providing GPS data from cellular telephone calls.

Mr. Potter said the potential for accident mapping appears to be available provided good data are collected in the field.  He explained that the potential for accurate, ease-of-use mapping ability will not occur until the communications systems are fully operational and that the mobile data terminals are replaced in the Sheriff's Department vehicles.  Ms. Kiefer inquired whether  other responders such as fire departments who have data would be able to provide information.  Mr. Potter explained that for the local police agencies data are available but not the fire departments.  He said that if requested, his department may be able to collect the data but he felt it may reflect only fifty percent of what may have occurred.

Mr. Penniman inquired what it would be like to delay this type of project until the communications systems were operational.  Mr. Potter said there is the need to standardize data at this time in a voice format that can be translated to mapping data.  Mr. Winch said it would be important to know from the information collected whether the accident was due to road construction or driver error.  Ms. Schuler expressed a desire to obtain information as soon as possible for those intersections already determined to be hazardous, she does not want to wait five years to be able to find solutions.

It was noted that Ms. Schuler has a specific request for information related to the Brown Road and Route 13 intersection.  She feels the intersection requires modification to prevent future accidents.  John Lampman has agreed to speak with New York State Department of Transportation officials.

18)  2004 Year-End Financial Report - Highway Division

 Mr. Squires provided members with the annual analysis for the Highway Division.  He noted there is an increase in the fund balance due to increased revenues, and partially due to bridge work not completed as well as a reduction in expenses for town services.  Mr. Squires said the Highway Department has a targeted fund balance of $175,000 so he would anticipate the excess will be earmarked for specific use in the future.  The Machinery Fund is low due to equipment purchases in 2004.

 Mr. Winch asked if it would be good to encumber the excess funds for a specific project.  Mr. Squires said normally an encumbrance is linked to a specific vendor; the State would then view this as a capital reserve and would have limitations that could require legislation to free it up.

 Mr. Marx explained that a surplus in snow and ice could be retained to offset future years expenses.  Mr. Squires said it could be beneficial to put the excess funds in the capital projects accounts.

 Mr. Penniman requested Mr. Squires come back with a recommendation for the excess funds.

19)  2004 Year End Financial Report - Airport

 Mr. Squires said the airport ended the year with a positive fund balance.  He explained it is anticipated it will be short-lived as there is a significant amount of liabilities for such a small balance.  He said the airport was fortunate that the airlines made timely payments, but he believes that by the year's end there will exist a deficit.  To date the airport has paid its local share of debt service as well as the shortfall it had previously experienced due to the decline of enplanements.  Two-thirds of the payment is made from the passenger charges of $2.93 per passenger.  Mr. Squires was asked to return to the Committee when he views difficulties or has 2005 projections.

20)  Airport Agreement with Cornell - Marketing and Development

 Mr. Marx reported that at this time the County is close to finalizing an agreement with Cornell University for the Marketing and Development plan at the airport and desires seeking approval.  He indicated the Air Service Committee as well as the Task Force has recommended maintaining the present staff during this period.  Mr. Marx explained it is thought that over the course of the next several years through the use of strategic marketing with airlines that the airport may be able to be at a better than break-even point.  The terms would include the County paying the salary of the individual with an incentive piece.  For the incentive piece to come into play it would require enplanements to increase in excess of 72,000 as well as meeting a revenue goal for Northwest Airlines.  The maximum cost for the goal would be $100,000 or less if a portion of the goal is met.  The contract will be for one year with a possible renewal for a second year; the funds will be provided through the airport with a possible deficit at the end of the year. The second option is a grant that the Air Service Task Force has applied for which would cover one-half of the cost.  Mr. Marx explained if the grant is received he believes the balance would be covered under the existing budget.  The staff member will be housed at Cornell University, travel expenses on the behalf of the County will be paid through the travel account, required items specific to the work that are costly will also be paid by the County.

 It was MOVED by Ms. Kiefer, seconded by Mr. Todd, and unanimously approved by voice vote,  to authorize moving ahead with the agreement between Tompkins County and Cornell University for the services of this staff member.

21) Position Request - Airport Fire Fighter/Operations Technician Trainee

It was MOVED by Mr. Winch, seconded by Ms. Kiefer.   Ms. Kiefer asked what efforts are being made to diversify the Airport workforce.  It was explained by Mr. Nicholas that he has a difficult time locating minority applicants for this position due to the requirements of the position.

 Mr. Todd left at this time (2:30 p.m.).

Mr. Nicholas expressed his willingness to speak to the Diversity Committee to seek their recommendations regarding this position.  Mr. Nicholas said the prospective candidate applications are reviewed by a Committee after Personnel has determined the individuals are eligible.  Mr. Winch feels the hiring should be delegated to one individual to be held responsible for diversity within the department/agency, he feels it would be difficult if it were a committee making the decision.  Mr. Nicholas said although he takes into account what the committee members have said the final decision is his responsibility.  Mr. Marx spoke of Mr. Nicholas' extensive attempts to obtain a minority individual previously without success.  In addition, Mr. Nicholas said the salary level is such that applicants from other areas are hesitant to relocate.  Mr. Nicholas plans to speak to members of the Workforce Diversity and Inclusion Committee as well as canvass fire departments and place advertisements in the local newspapers.  It was noted that there does not exist a current list to choose from and that it is possible to hire an individual subject to passing the exam.

Mr. Penniman said that within the next several months the Committee will be reviewing the airport's hiring plan to determine it meets the needs of the County.

A voice vote resulted as follows:  Ayes - 4; Noes - 0; Excused - 1 (Legislator Todd).

22)  2005 Facilities Division Goals

 Mr. Penniman postponed this discussion until a later date.

23)  Facilities Status Report

Members reviewed the Facilities Status Report and noted the following:

· Old Jail Third Floor Renovations - Mr. Tunney met with Administration and the Attorney's office.  At this time there are some changes due to staffing needs.  A new estimate will be forthcoming.  There will be modifications to allow for more space in the Attorney's offices.
· Building C Generator - the design work is started with two options:  roof mounted or an at-grade installation.  Structural strength as well as quieting options are being reviewed.
· Tompkins County Public Library Front Entrance Improvements - the agreement has been completed and signed by QPK and the County to do mechanical improvements to the entrance.
· Building C Airflow - modifications to a diffuser were completed to provide for more adequate airflow
· Public Safety Building - a review of potential modifications for secured ceiling ductwork has been undertaken pending possible variances.
· Tompkins County Public Library - a list of maintenance requests will be reviewed to determine responsibility and make recommendations
· Biggs B - due to age and weather there have been extensive leaks in the porch portion of the metal roof on the building.  In addition, ceiling tile removal  due to the leaks have caused asbestos disturbances requiring $5,000 of mitigation work.  It is recommended that a membrane roof with a ten-year warranty be placed over the existing roof.  The Committee requested Mr. LeMaro and Mr. Marx further review the information and bring back to the Committee a recommendation on funding for this repair work.

The Committee will have a special meeting on March 22, 2005 at 10:30 a.m. to further discuss the subject of Biggs B roof repair.

24)  Budget Adjustment - Facilities

 It was MOVED by Ms. Schuler, seconded by Mr. Winch, and unanimously approved by voice vote of members present, to approve the following budget adjustment for submission to the full Legislature:

Facilities
Revenue Acct           Title            Amt  Approp Acct  Title(s) _____________
1620.42797 Other Local Govt.    $41,000 1620.54470         Building Repairs
    Contributions

Explanation:  Mitigation payment from City of Ithaca to be used towards efficiency measures at the Public Library.

25)  Drug and Alcohol Screening

 Ms. Nelson reported the present contract was extended through the end of March 2005, at which time the new State contract bidder will begin services.  The firm is Energetics from Hempstead, New York.  Drug testing will be done through the Guthrie Clinic on Hanshaw Road.

Adjournment

 The meeting adjourned at 5:15 p.m.

Respectfully submitted, Karen Fuller, Deputy Clerk.