HEALTH AND HUMAN SERVICES COMMITTEE
APRIL 14, 2004        11:30 A.M.
SCOTT HEYMAN CONFERENCE ROOM


Present:  M. Robertson, Chair; T. Todd; B. Blanchard; N. Schuler; M. Koplinka-Loehr

Staff:       S. Whicher, County Administrator; N. Zahler, Youth Services Director; M. Dill, Human Services Coalition; J. Johnson, Youth Services; S. Allinger, Health Department; J. Taylor, Health Department; B. Crosby, Health Department; M. Banks, Social Services Department; K. Schlather, Social Services Department; I. Stein, Office for the Aging

Called to Order

    The meeting was called to order at 11:30 p.m.

Additions to the Agenda

    A budget adjustment and transfer for the Office for the Aging were added to the agenda. 

Chair's Report

    Ms. Robertson said she did not have a report. 

Report from the County Administrator

    Prescription Drug Program
    Mr. Whicher said he has been investigating proposals for prescription drugs and updated the Committee on his progress.  The counties of Ulster, Broome, and Westchester are currently participating in a countywide Rx program, including non-county employees. Mr. Whicher reported on a meeting with a representative from Eckerd and said he discussed and explained the County's situation.  Eckerd provided excellent information and expressed interest in administering a countywide program, but would not support the purchase of Canadian drugs.  He feels it is time to take this to the next level and have an elected official become a spokesperson.  Counties have been preparing Requests for Proposals and Eckerd has been responding.  Mr. Whicher said one problem area identified in the budget last year was the increased cost of prescription drugs which is driving up the health insurance and fringe costs.  He commented that more than $2 million in County dollars are spent on prescriptions.

    Mr. Whicher spoke specifically about a proposal and said one idea is to bring everyone in the County into one group.  He described how prescription drug programs are set up.  An average wholesale price is established and a discount is negotiated, generally dependent on the size of the group covered by the policy.  The County's current program with Eckerd is a 14 percent discount from the wholesale price if the prescription drug is purchased at a pharmacy (30-day supply).  If the prescription drug is mail ordered, the discount is 16 percent.  In the Westchester County proposal, it appears the discount is 9 percent for prescriptions filled at a pharmacy and 18 percent if the prescription is mail ordered (90-day supply).  In general, Canadian drugs are priced at 35% discount from the average wholesale price.  Mr. Whicher said the more people in the prescription drug program, the higher the discount is.  He feels the County (a population of 100,000) should strive to get a 25-30 percent discount and he will continue to pursue this until he is satisfied.  County Administrators throughout the State are meeting in early May to discuss this and County Executives are already working on proposals.  He hopes to bring a majority of the counties together and make a recommendation; he was optimistic that this could be implemented by 2005.  Mr. Whicher said he is considering contracting with the Human Services Coalition to assist with this.

    Ms. Robertson commented on a meeting she had with several individuals (Joe Scaglione, Maria Coles, and Jeff Furman) to discuss some of these issues and feels there is significant public concern about health care costs and people being uninsured.

    State Budget Update
    Mr. Whicher said he has nothing new to report about the State Budget.  Departments have submitted their estimates on the impacts and said the Legislature will discuss that further at the retreat on April 27th.  Currently, he is estimating a $1 million increase (10%) in overall Medicaid expenses. 

    Mandated and Locally Controlled Spending
    Mr. Whicher gave a brief overview of the Mandated and Locally Controlled Spending (2002-2004) information being reviewed by the Budget and Capital Committee.  Ms. Robertson said she would like to have the numbers for 2001 added to the list and will ask Ms. Thomas to provide that information.  She feels having those numbers will show a better picture as she feels that was the last budget before mandates started to dramatically increase.
   
    Mr. Koplinka-Loehr summarized the Budget and Capital Committee's review of the list and said a recommendation was made to move programs 4016 - Community Health Services and 4095 - Public Health State Aid from Locally Controlled Spending to the Mandated Responsibility list.  Following a brief discussion, it was the consensus of the Committee to accept this recommendation of the Budget and Capital Committee. 

    Ms. Robertson said she will work with Jackie Thomas about including 2001 information and moving the two items as recommended above. 

    Rollover Summary
    Mr. Whicher briefly reviewed the rollover summary and said the Public Health Department has a 2003 deficit of $400,000 in the Certified Home Health Agency program.  He said the deficit was anticipated by the Department, but not to that extreme.  The fact that their rollover deficit is less than $250,000 is due to midyear cuts the department made last year as it saw their revenues come in lower than budgeted.  The Department is reviewing and documenting their records.  One question that has been raised and is being explored is whether the Department was cut too much.  In other words, there is concern that nursing staff was cut so low that revenue from clients was affected, or perhaps that billing was slowed because of a shortage in clerical staff.  An interim report is expected to be filed with the County Administrator by Friday and a final report will follow once the accountant has come in and done his review.  Mr. Whicher said there will need to be a discussion on how to handle this deficit at a future meeting.

    Ms. Robertson said this was discussed at the Board of Health meeting yesterday at length.  Ms. Crosby spoke about some of things staff is working on and the reports they are running.  She also reported briefly on recent billings and accounts receivables and said that if all that money is received, the Department will have 40 percent of its revenue for this year.  Staff is looking at new admissions and there is a small increase in unduplicated caseloads.  Ms. Robertson requested this item be discussed at the next meeting.

    Mr. Whicher said there was a small deficit in the Department of Social Services but said it is not of concern. 

Youth Services

    Ms. Robertson briefly reported on questions raised about whether or not the County could contract with Cooperative Extension to perform the functions of a County youth bureau.  She learned the State’s legal opinion is youth bureaus must report directly to the chief executive or administrator of the county.  Core administrative duties and monitoring functions assigned in law to youth bureaus cannot be contracted out to Cooperative Extension.  She said there is still the possibility of contracting some functions and will continue to explore the options. 

    Municipal Youth Services System and Highlights of 2003
    Ms. Zahler briefly reported on the Municipal Youth Services System and said this year they are celebrating 15 years.  She shared a map outlining the changes in the system over the last 15 years, and said that 300 youth were served in 1987 with 0.15 FTE county staff support, and in 2003 there were 2,901 youth served with 1.65 FTE county staff. 

    Ms. Johnson said the system enables the program to seek out young people who do not participate in traditional school programs, community programs, or recreational programs.  Anyone can participate in the programs, but there is a recruitment effort to reach those young people at risk.  This program allows equitable distribution of programs and resources throughout the County. 

    Ms. Johnson explained some of the duties the professional staff provides such as grant writing, assisting with community needs assessments, youth surveys, broader community planning, etc.  One example cited was the need in Groton for a local summer camp.  With county staff assistance, they have pulled together local resources to develop a program to meet this need.

    Ms. Schuler suggested the written information provided to the Committee be shared with the full Legislature. 

    Ms. Blanchard stated that as long as the County keeps providing, the population being served will continue to grow to respond to what is available.  This is a trend that is somewhat troubling to her and she feels that some of these children are not desperately in need of these programs. 

    It was noted that the total budget for youth programs has not decreased, only the distribution has changed, but the County funds have decreased. 

    Mr. Todd feels the numbers of youth in the County are decreasing based on school enrollments.  Ms. Zahler said in fact the numbers of youth in the county, based on the 2000 census, have not changed, though they have moved around.  At this time, there is a bulge in the middle and high schools and there is a smaller number of elementary children.

    Independent Living Survey Project
    Ms. Robertson deferred discussion on this item due to lack of time.  However, she noted the one item that kept coming up in the survey was the statement that there is nothing cheap or free for kids to do in the County, and she related this to the value of the Municipal Youth Services program. 

    Summer Camp Guide
    Ms. Zahler distributed copies of the 2004 Summer Camp Guide at this time.

Health Department

    Transportation Services for Special Care Needs
    Ms. Taylor reported the current contract expires at the end of August. The Department needs to develop a new contract and would like permission to develop an RFP (Request for Proposals) for transportation services. 

    Following a brief discussion, it was the consensus of the Committee to authorize the Department to bid the service and the Committee will award.  It was noted that the county receives a 50% reimbursement for transportation for Early Intervention services.

Department of Social Services

    Consolidated Services Plan
    Ms. Schlather said the County is required to submit a three-year Consolidated Services Plan to the State Office of Children and Family Services.  There are two parts of the plan.  One is the Administrative component that reviews the regulations around child care services, funding sources, legal assurances, memorandum of understanding with District Attorney's office, domestic violence services, and program information. 

The second part of the report is the strategic component which reviews the services for youth and families and preventive services for adults. Feedback on the plan was received at a presentation at the forum and the public hearing. 

Ms. Banks said the plan is a small part of all the goals and trends in the children's services division.  There were three other plans that were required last year and some areas of those plans were incorporated into this plan.  The Consolidated Services Plan does not reflect the changes and requirements staff will have to fulfill this year toward building a system with an electronic case record for all the children's services.  The Department will have to implement the Chaffee's Independence Act and health requirements and contract planning for children in foster care.  One of the major focuses in children's services for the next three years is to help New York State reach its child welfare targets which are set by the Federal government.  If New York State does not improve with meeting its targets, there maybe some financial sanctions.  The Department agrees with the targets that children should be safe, have permanent housing within a certain period of time, and stability.  There was discussion during the community meetings concerning child welfare goals and the need to have partnerships with community providers.  The Department has contracts for preventive service with many providers and will be focusing on goals and measuring outcomes. 

One area of plan the Department will focus on this year in the Child Protective Services unit is recurrence of abuse.  When it is verified that a child was abused, the Department does not want to have a recurrence of another incident.  This is one area Ms. Banks is concerned with and said she is putting together a team and will be working on this immediately to reduce the rate of recurrence of indicated reports.  It was acknowledged that some of the increase could be due to improved reporting.

Ms. Banks commented that fewer children were placed in foster care in 2003, but more were readmitted.

Mr. Koplinka-Loehr was excused at 12:55 p.m.

Ms. Banks continued to provide an overview of the plan and said in 2002, 25 percent of the children who were adopted were adopted within two years of their foster care placement.  In the preventive services area, she would like to continue providing intensive preventive services and support for the facilitated visitation service offered by Cooperative Extension.  The caseload is increased for the Intensive Prevention Case Manager, so Ms. Banks is watching that program.  She would also like to continue the contracts with Liberty Resources for Multisystemic Therapy and Youth Advocacy Program for wrap-around services for youth and their families; she believes these community based service plans help avoid institutional placement.  In addition, the Department would like to continue the Therapeutic After School Program, which is a collaboration among area schools, Social Services, and George Jr. Republic for youngsters who would otherwise almost certainly be expelled from school.  The Salvation Army contract for respite for adoptive families is expiring, but the Racker Centers may take it over.

Ms. Banks noted that the piece on detention is not included in this plan as it has been incorporated into the Youth Services Plan. 

She reported one concern raised at the public hearing was transitional services for teens, as expressed in the homeless youth survey, and housing for adult protective clients.  A lot of the overall caseload is teenagers.  Ms. Schlather said that the comments made at the forum and public hearing can be made available upon request. 

Office for the Aging

    Program Updates
    Ms. Stein gave an update on the funding concerns raised at a recent meeting by Foodnet.  It was reported that Foodnet may have a $40,000 deficit this year; however on April 1, $12,000 will be added to their budget and $16,000 will be added April 1, 2005, as ongoing funding.  In addition, an application was filed to request funding from the Community Development Block Grant through the City; that proposal made the first cut so they are hopeful that they will receive $15,000. This would make up $31,000 of the $40,000 shortfall.

    Ms. Stein reported the Department lost $3,000 in Federal funding this year.  There is a waiting list of 21 people for the in-home personal care and assistance program (EISEP).  She is about to begin negotiating contracts with various agencies and if increases are negotiated there will have to be more cut hours and more waiting list problems.  Ms. Stein said the client needs right now total about $30,000 more than the Department has in its budget.  The preliminary report that the Department received is that there could be a cut in State funding as well. 

    Ms. Robertson commented on a letter she received from the State Office for the Aging concerning the annual evaluation of the local office.  The County Office for the Aging received praise for consistently being highly motivated, creative, and effective in building partnerships with County, public, and private agencies.  The staff is assertive and persistent in finding ways to meet the needs of the elderly population in the County.  Amidst ever increasing fiscal constraints, each annual evaluation conducted by the State finds the Department in compliance with State and Federal regulations. 

    Transfer
    It was MOVED by Ms. Blanchard, seconded by Ms. Schuler, and unanimously adopted by voice vote by members present, to submit the following transfer to the full Legislature for approval:

From Acct                   Title                            Amt            To  Acct         Title(s)   
6783-51000571           Salary                          $200           6783-54330      Printing
6783-51000571           Salary                          $200           6783-54452      Postage

Explanation:  Transfer needed to cover the printing and postage for Needs Assessment project.

Approval of Minutes

    It was MOVED by Ms. Schuler, seconded by Ms. Blanchard, and unanimously adopted by voice vote by members present, to approve the minutes of the March 24th meeting as submitted.

Adjournment

    The meeting adjourned at 1:16 p.m.

Go to Tompkins County Homepage

Questions or Comments