MINUTES
GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
APRIL 15, 2004          2:00 P.M.
COURTHOUSE CONFERENCE ROOM

Present:   M. Lane, Chair; N. Schuler; K. Herrera; D. Winch; D. Kiefer (arrived at 2:05 p.m.)

Staff:       D. Squires, Finance Director; J. Wood, County Attorney; N. Jayne, Administration; J. Franklin, Assessment; V. Coggin, Assessment Director; S. Whicher, County Administrator

Guests:    T. Todd, County Legislator; A. Tutino, Ithaca Journal Reporter

Called to Order

    The meeting was called to order at 2:00 p.m.

Approval of Minutes

    It was MOVED by Mr. Winch, seconded by Ms. Schuler, and unanimously adopted by voice vote by members present, to approve the minutes of the March 18th meeting as submitted. 

    Mr. Lane reported that he requested Mrs. Covert to begin excerpting from the Committee minutes into a report the discussions held concerning a County Executive form of government.

Discussion - County Executive

    Fieldtrip to Chemung County
    Mr. Lane asked Administration to schedule a trip to Chemung County to meet with various officials to discuss their form of government.  Below is list of some of the officials in Chemung County; Mr. Lane hopes to meet with as many of them as possible:
County Executive
Deputy County Executive
Chair of the Legislature
Majority Leader
Minority Leader
   
    At this time, the Committee discussed possible dates for the fieldtrip and proposed the mornings of May 7, May 10, or May 11.  Ms. Jayne said she would contact Chemung County to see if the dates were acceptable and report back. 

    Ms. Kiefer arrived at this time.

    Discussion with Legislator Todd
    Mr. Lane said he invited Legislator Todd to the meeting to allow him to explain his feelings and opinions about a County Executive position.

    Mr. Todd reported on his visit with the Chemung County Executive and said he found it to be very interesting.  Mr. Santulli is the second County Executive in that County in the last ten years approximately; serving as the assistant to the first Executive.

    He presented the Committee with several points for considering a County Executive form of government.  He explained the procedure for creating a County Executive position is fairly complicated and would require the County Legislature to vote to have it on the ballot in November for the people of the County to decide. 

    Mr. Todd stated County government is the only form of government that does not have an executive.  All other levels of government including the city, villages, and towns have executive officers elected by those populations in those particular districts.  One reason he supports a County Executive position is that the County has a budget of more than $100,000 million and feels there should be someone who is held responsible to all the people in the County.

    Mr. Todd spoke about the budget process in Chemung County and said there are procedures in place for line item vetoing for the Executive and overriding provisions for the Legislature.  He feels a legislature should set policy and that it’s the executive's responsibility for the management of the budget and execution of legislative policy. 

    Mr. Todd reiterated his belief that it is the responsibility of the Tompkins County Legislature to place this decision on the ballot in November for the voters of the County to decide on the form of government and hopes the Committee will make that recommendation. 

    Mr. Lane asked what changed Legislator Todd's opinion as he recalls in 1995, the Charter Review Committee with Legislator Todd serving as one of its members, voted unanimously to maintain the current form of government.  Mr. Todd said the reason for changing his mind is because of the budget over the last couple of years.  He does not believe the County Legislature will regain control of the budget without an elected County Executive.  Mr. Lane asked if one area the Committee should be examining is the control of the budget in other counties with County Executives versus County Administrators; Mr. Todd agreed with this suggestion.

    Mr. Lane commented on a statement made by Mr. Todd in that he does not feel the towns and villages are a comparison as mayors and supervisors are only one vote on the council or board. 

    Ms. Herrera said she would like to continue studying this issue; however, she asked if it was possible for individuals to file a petition for referendum requesting this issue be placed on the ballot.  Mr. Wood stated this law is subject to mandatory referendum regardless not requiring a petition. 

    Mr. Squires stated that it is his opinion based on experience that a County Executive system would diminish the role of the Legislature.  He feels it would become more partisan and be similar to State Governor where things get done in caucus.  He spoke about the additional costs of an County Executive form of government and said Putnam County's Legislature hired a consultant to analyze their budget as did Dutchess County.  Some counties with County Executives also have elected comptrollers to separate out executive power from paying bills to be reviewed by an independent auditor.  He said too with a line-item veto procedure, a two-thirds majority is often required by the Legislature to overturn and is then put in a position of raising taxes.

    Mr. Todd again stated his opinion that he hopes the Legislature will vote to put this item on the ballot in November as he feels the budget will not be under control with the present system.  Ms. Kiefer feels the budget is under control; it is the increase in the tax rate that is not.

    Mr. Wood distributed copies of an outline on the timetable for adopting a local law to place this on the ballot as it requires a Charter amendment.

Changes to Agenda

    A report from the Communications Capital Projects Committee was added to the agenda.

Assessment Department

    Options for Assessment Administration Program
    Ms. Coggin presented the Committee with options in lieu of annual assessments.  She hoped the scenarios presented will assist the Committee in its discussions for deciding which direction to recommend to the Legislature.  The Department's work begins July 1.  If the County were to choose another form of assessment, the Department would need time to make administrative adjustments.  Three scenarios were presented:  Annual reassessment (current practice), cyclical revaluation 3-5 years, and cyclical revaluation every 10 years.  As the Assessor of the County, she is committed to deliver the best and most equitable program for the residents of the County and said the current program is the one that can deliver an equitable assessment roll each year. 

    She believes that people are beginning to understand the current assessment program is equitable in that properties are being assessed 100 percent market value annually.  At this time, Ms. Coggin reviewed the scenarios presented to Committee.  She said if the current system were continued, additional staff would be needed.  The Department is waiting to hear if the annual reassessment maintenance funding from the State is ongoing beyond the sunset date of 2004.   If the County were to change to a program other than annual assessment, the State funding would no longer be available. 

    Ms. Kiefer said she is not surprised to hear the need for additional staff if the County continued the current system since the staffing level was reduced beyond what is needed.  In response to Ms. Kiefer's question, Ms. Coggin said with the cyclical alternatives, assessments cannot be done on a rolling average concept.  According to Real Property Tax Law, properties must be assessed at equal percentage of value each year.  If the Assessment Department were to use an averaging system, the equalization rate would change and it is likely the lower priced properties would carry the burden.  Mr. Franklin said when the equalization rate falls below 100 percent, the County would be relying on the State to determine the full value of the property and the State survey is usually two years behind.

    Ms. Herrera spoke as a working person and said there is a lot of resentment regardless of how committed people are to understand the theory behind the assessment.  She said people may understand, but they still do not agree with it and has heard many comments from her constituents about the rising assessments.  Before she makes a decision on the direction to recommend for assessment, she would like more information from the State on the maintenance program, and the impact on staff. 

    Mr. Lane said he agrees with Ms. Herrera's comments and that people still see the connection between taxes and assessments.  He suggested the County take a break from annual assessments and begin a three-year plan.  He spoke about the Town of Dryden's experience with assessments in 2000 and said that municipality was hit hard at that time.

    Ms. Kiefer said she does not support Mr. Lane's recommendation of three-years as she feels annual assessments make Tompkins County special.  She believes there is going to be an upturn in the economy and inflation. 

    Mr. Whicher feels that if the County were to shift to a three-year cycle, there would be a loss of revenue from the State and cost the taxpayers more in the years 2005 and 2006.  Mr. Winch said he would like to see this information in the format of a graph. 

    Mr. Lane said if the three-year system was adopted, the next assessment would be done in 2007.  He noted assessments would continue on new construction and there would be less litigation. 

    Mr. Franklin referred to Real Property Tax Law Section 305 that states all property must be assessed each year at a uniform percent of value.  Although, he commented that this law is not necessarily enforced in New York State he felt it was important to mention. 
    Ms. Herrera said she would like to have information showing a 3-5 year change in assessments, i.e., the Fall Creek area.  Mr. Franklin said he would do a financial analysis showing the comparisons of doing assessments and not doing them from 2001-2004.  Ms. Herrera said if it is possible she would also like to have projections as well. 

    Mr. Lane said he will ask the County Attorney to draft the appropriate legislation for the Committee to consider at the next meeting that recommends a three-year assessment system.

Human Rights Commission

    Appointment
    It was MOVED by Ms. Schuler, seconded by Mr. Winch, and unanimously adopted by voice vote by members present (Ms. Herrera was temporarily out of the room), to submit the following appointment to the full Legislature for approval:

    Board of Human Rights Commissioners
    Josephine Carcich - term expires December 31, 2006

Report from the Finance Director

    Mr. Squires updated the Committee on the foreclosed properties in the Jacksonville area and asked if the Committee wished to include the properties in the auction.  Following a visit to the properties, he reported they are unoccupied.  Questions were raised concerning the septic systems and Mr. Squires learned the septic system is located on one of the adjacent properties and that the adjacent homeowners have expressed interest in purchasing the two parcels.  Mr. Squires encouraged the Committee to auction the two properties.

    Following a brief discussion, it was MOVED by Mr. Winch, seconded by Ms. Herrera, and unanimously adopted by voice vote, to authorize Mr. Squires to auction the two Jacksonville properties.

    Mr. Squires provided a brief update on the other foreclosed properties and said the list also includes City properties. 

    He reported on the situation with the tax collection in the Town of Caroline.  The Town has a new Clerk, but is receiving assistance from the Town of Danby.  The installment return from the Town of Caroline was received yesterday whereas other towns returned their installments in early February.  He said there may be some questions raised by residents, but that the Town of Danby is assisting. 

Report from the County Administrator


    Mr. Whicher said a question was raised at the Communications Capital Projects Committee concerning the County's contract process and asked if the appropriate program committee could review the policies pertaining to the contract process.  The Committee agreed to review the policy at the next meeting. 

Report from the County Attorney


    Mr. Wood said he did not have a report.

Report from the Chair

    Mr. Lane reported Legislator Robertson has requested this Committee review the roles of liaisons.   Following a brief discussion, the Committee agreed to invite Ms. Robertson in to discuss this subject.
    Mr. Winch was excused at 3:55 p.m.

Annual Financial Disclosure Forms

    This item was postponed.

Adjournment

    The meeting adjourned at 3:56 p.m.

Tompkins County Home Page
 Tompkins County Legislature's Page
Comments or questions