MINUTES
GOVERNMENT OPERATIONS COMMITTEE
OCTOBER 27, 2004          3:00 P.M.
SCOTT HEYMAN CONFERENCE ROOM

Present:  K. Herrera, Vice Chair; D. Winch; N. Schuler; D. Kiefer (arrived at 3:05 p.m.); M. Lane (arrived at 3:27 p.m.)

Staff:      C. Covert, Clerk of the Legislature; J. Wood, County Attorney; J. Kippola, Administration; S. Whicher, County Administrator

Called to Order

    Vice Chair Herrera called the meeting to order at 3:03 p.m.

Approval of Minutes

    It was MOVED by Mr. Winch, seconded by Ms. Schuler, and unanimously adopted by voice vote by members present, to approve the minutes of August 19, September 16, and October 19, 2004, as submitted. 

Contracts Policy

    Ms. Kiefer arrived at this time.

    Ms. Kippola distributed copies of the draft Contracts policy and highlighted the changes.  The significant changes include a revised policy statement, dollar amounts for capital projects and the approval level by the Legislature, and a paragraph concerning record of experience. 

    Mr. Winch expressed a concern that the paragraph regarding the reporting of performance issues needs to be monitored carefully to prevent any legal concerns arising.  He also feels the contract managers or appropriate person(s) should have some training before this is implemented and that Ms. Kippola be responsible for that training.  Ms. Kippola commented that David Squires would be the holder of the reports and comments.   It was also noted that positive comments, not just negative, can be reported in some manner. 

    Following a brief discussion, it was MOVED by Mr. Winch, seconded by Ms. Schuler, and unanimously adopted by voice vote by members present, to approve and submit the Contracts policy to the full Legislature as presented.

Apprenticeship Program

    Ms. Kippola distributed a draft report she prepared listing the County's projects in the last three years and the contractors identifying union or non-union and the difference between non-union award and next union bidder. 

    Mr. Lane arrived at this time.

    Following further discussion, Ms. Herrera presented the following proposed language she would like to add to the resolution adopted by the Committee at the last meeting and hoped it would answer some concerns raised with locking out small and/or specialty contractors. 

    RESOLVED, further, That a total of 25 percent of the monetary value of the contract may be exempted from this requirement to permit the use of small or specialty subcontractors who would otherwise be excluded.
    Ms. Kiefer appreciated the willingness to find a way to include smaller local contractors but    wanted clarity on how this would be applied.  She also wanted Ms. Kippola to finish the analysis of how this resolution might have changed bid awards on past county contracts, noting that without that analysis she can't judge whether 25 percent and $1 million are the right parameters.  Following discussion on the resolution and no action being taken, Ms. Herrera said the original resolution as approved at the last meeting will be placed on the next Legislature's agenda and she will likely present a substitute resolution that includes the above-mentioned resolved.  Ms. Kippola agreed to provide an updated spreadsheet she presented earlier in the meeting and submit it prior to the Legislature's meeting on November 3rd. 

Report from the County Attorney

    Mr. Wood updated the Committee on a litigation matter.  Several months ago he reported on a case involving the Mental Health Association where children were abused.  The County's insurance company hired an outside attorney at our suggestion and the attorney wrote a letter urging the individuals not to sue the County because the County did not have anything to do with the case and a suit was filed but the County was not sued.  The attorney will be sending the Mental Health Association a bill requesting payment. 

Report from the County Administrator

    Mr. Whicher did not have a report.

Financial Disclosure Forms


    Required Filers
    Mr. Lane asked Mr. Wood if there was anything more to report on the question raised at the last meeting concerning the County Assessors being required to file financial disclosure statements.  Mr. Wood said he does not have any new information as the law is so new.  However, he said he will speak with Ms. Coggin, Assessment Director, before the next Committee meeting.

    Review of Financial Disclosure Form
    Ms. Kiefer referred to the cover letter she sent to the Committee summarizing and explaining the importance of the form. 

    At this time, the Committee reviewed and discussed at length the revised Financial Disclosure form as recommended by the Ethics Advisory Board. 

    Following the review, Mr. Lane said he has not heard any comments from Legislators concerning the current form but has heard concerns from some County staff.  Mr. Wood said as one of the individuals who reviews the forms and takes questions, it is his view that there are two major problems with the current form.  One problem is the question on investments and said it is very confusing and interpreted differently by employees and he would like to have it clarified.  The strongest objection he has received is the listing of values.  The second problem is the question concerning household members and he personally finds it to be very offensive. 

    Mr. Lane said the questions he has are how much information is necessary for household residents, the public's right to know and need to know, and how much information is needed concerning not-for-profits. 

    Ms. Herrera said she disagrees with much of the form as she feels it is invasive, makes false assumptions, and requires interrogation of household members.  She expressed her opinion that she would like to address the problems with the current form.

    Mr. Winch said the proposed form does not feel right with him and that it is invasion of privacy.  He does not feel key employees should have to fill this out. 

    Mr. Winch was excused at 4:52 p.m.

    Ms. Kiefer said the proposed form attempted to address concerns raised by Committee members at previous meetings.  She hoped the proposed revisions to the Code of Ethics might be ready for the next agenda and that may help provide content for the disclosure form.     

Adjournment

    The meeting adjourned at 4:58 p.m.

  Tompkins County Home Page
 Tompkins County Legislature's Page
Comments or questions