TOMPKINS COUNTY
Board
of Elections
REVIEW OF 2003
COMMISSIONERS
Elizabeth W. Cree and Stephen M. DeWitt
REORGANIZATIONAL Plan
NEW STAFFING
WITHIN BUDGET CONSTRAINTS
2003 started with many
changes to the structure of the Board of Elections. Budget cuts resulted in a loss of two full time employees. In January, one new Commissioner on the
Democratic side of the aisle, a new Assistant to the Commissioner (promoted
from within) and two new part time employees started. This required that staffing duties be reassigned due to the lack
of full time positions and new federal legislation.
Quickly it became apparent that business as usual
just was not possible anymore with fewer staff. We reorganized the duties and cut any “extras” that we currently
provided. The following were reduced or eliminated:
·
Counter lists run on a monthly basis (saved a day’s work and 4 reams of paper,
new record keeping measures for Election Results to save inputting twice).
·
The returns of canvass were no longer published in
the local newspaper.
·
Inspector training classes were reduced and the
size of the classes went from 20 to 80 trainees (reduced approximately 80 hours
of training)
·
Web page updates are not as timely. Not as much information as the voters would
like available.
·
Outreach programs were severely reduced. Commissioners had to assist with many
clerical duties to make tight deadlines.
Staff was asked to work
as many hours as possible and we still couldn’t complete all our yearly tasks.
In 2004, we are finally filing our mail check that began in late August. Our Legislative committee, Consumer and
Community Affairs recognized our efforts and did recommend for restoration of
staff to our original level. They
worked with us throughout the year and tried to assist us with new ideas to
lessen our load. We appreciate the time
they spent with us over the many NEW issues from HAVA.
This legislation was
under a lot of scrutiny this year especially because the requirements needed to
be defined for implementation. It was a
long year with many discussions and many changes to our current
operations. A state task force was set
up and a plan was submitted to the federal government this past summer. This plan now has to wait for review by the
Election Assistance Commission. The
National Institute of Standards and Technology met with 170 people representing
different groups to discuss the concerns around the new voting machines. The biggest push seen around the state is
for machines with a paper trail because there is a concern about security. We are aware of one vendor that will have
this option available in February of 2004.
Our board is committed to making a very educated and informed decision
before purchasing any machines.
Funds: New
York State has received over $66 million in federal money with approximately
$830 million remaining for distribution to all states. At this time, New York State has not been
granted authority to allot any monies.
STATEWIDE VOTER REGISTRATION DATABASE: Since no funds have been allocated, the
continuing work of a statewide database will have to wait until 2005. An outside firm will be hired on state
contract to help with the design and then the project will be put out to
bid. Once this system is in place, we
will be able to keep much better track of registrants to ensure no “double”
voting is occurring from county to county or state to state.
Board of Elections must
develop a transitional plan to introduce the new electronic machines to the
public as well as the actual running of the election with the new
equipment. Not knowing when the funds
would be available, the Commissioners presented a plan early in the year for
Centralization of the machines. Our plan has been shared with counties around
the state. Currently, each municipality
owns and maintains their machines. For
years, the discrepancy between towns, their storage and maintenance plans has
caused difficulties in making sure the machines are in good working order. Because the electronic machines will have
different requirements such as backing up the systems three times during the
year, it would be more effective to own the machines and keep them in one central
location. The ideal location would be
the “old library” which is very close to our office. The space requirements are perfect for our needs. Currently, there is state legislation being
introduced for all boards to be centralized.
But, this brings up different issues because of payment of custodians
and election inspectors. For a general
election, the budget impact would be approximately $160,000 more for local
share funds that we currently do not receive from the county. Our board does not wish to take over the
current machines, but would rather wait until the new machines have been
purchased. Whether we centralize or not should be decided in 2004.
Our voter registration form for the
State of New York is revised every four years after a Gubernatorial
election. The reason behind the change
is that a party must receive 50,000 votes statewide to receive ballot status.
HAVA now requires identification for any new voters by mail. Little did we know that a court case would
hold up the whole process and we did not have a new form until a couple of
weeks before the General Election! This
caused our workload to increase because there was no place for voters to write
down their NY state driver’s license number or the last 4 digits of their
social security number. Staff had to
send letters out to all new voters by mail to obtain this information. If we had the new form it would have saved
the additional mailings.
Court Cases and
Legislative Changes
174 petitions were filed
for 72 offices and out those we had several challenges. The Commissioners upheld all petitions,
except one. A petition for Tompkins
County Court, Family Court Judge and Surrogate went to the Supreme Court and
was heard by Justice Robert Mulvey. This petition was also upheld. This consumed most of our summer months.
Statewide court cases changed the way we maintain
our records at the board. Three
recognized parties, the Green, Liberal and Right to Life parties did not
receive enough votes statewide to have automatic ballot status. The parties still want the boards to
maintain voter records of their registrants.
With an unprecedented decision, the judge ruled that the county boards
must keep track of all former and future Green, Right to Life and Liberal party
members and all future enrollees in the Libertarian and Marijuana Reform
parties. This changed our database as
well as requiring an “other” box on our registration form for writing in party
names. The outcome of another
interesting court case in 2003 now allows all non-enrolled voters to
participate in an Independence Party Primary election for statewide and federal
offices.
For the fifth year in a
row, the Tompkins County Board of Elections received an award for innovative
procedures in elections. Out of 62 county boards only a handful were recognized
at the annual spring conference. Our county board is always in constant contact
with other boards and we share different ideas throughout the year. Our staff is committed to new ideas that
make our processes move more smoothly. This team effort is what makes our board
stand out amongst their peers.
Commissioner Cree continues to work with the Election Commissioners’
Association as the first Vice-President.
We finally finished
redistricting the city of Ithaca, which was a three-year process. The town and city of Ithaca also had changes
in polling locations and both municipalities wanted to ensure that the voters
received more than the one required notice for these changes. We worked with the municipalities and only
charged them for supplies for the additional mailing. Our town clerks have been extremely helpful with coordination on
election days and throughout the year.
It really is a pleasure to work with them and they truly understand the
efforts needed to make an election run efficiently.
MAIL CHECK
A total of 46,777 mail check cards were mailed to
Tompkins County residents on August 26, 2003.
The mail check card serves several purposes – verification of residence
and mailing address, notification of election information, and it has also
become a great tool in recruiting election inspectors.
|
MCF |
1,390 |
In County Transfers |
1, 532 |
|
|
MCNF |
1, 024 |
Misc. Returns |
641 |
|
|
Total
Card Returned |
4,587 |
|||
NATIONAL CHANGE OF ADDRESS
The Board annually compares voter rolls against the
National Listing prior to June 1.
Unfortunately this year, due to a change in the state chosen vendor, the
NCOA was delayed until June 9, 2003.
This meant that the 1,024 changes that needed to be made unfortunately
coincided with the time to sign and pass designating petitions.
|
In County Transfers |
494 |
|
Out of County
(Inactive) |
530 |
INSPECTORS
As stated earlier, the number of inspector classes
were reduced, resulting in only 7 classes in 2003, with 132 inspectors
trained. The average test score was 83
and the average age is 62. The number
of new recruits totaled 52. Recruitment
of inspectors is extremely difficult.
An important point to remember about the training is even though the
bigger class size is a timesaver; we believe the smaller classes allow for
better training. Some of the attendees
will ask more questions in a smaller group.
We offered some ideas to the legislators in trying to assist us in our
recruitment. Anita Fitzpatrick, the
personnel director, also offered some good ideas. Our plan now is to work with the County Workforce Development
Agency. They have access to lists of
substitute teachers, bus drivers and other outlets that we didn’t have access
to before. The 17 plus hour day is the
major hindrance in retaining our inspectors.
The pay of approximately $100 for the day doesn’t tempt anyone when the
hours are extremely long. Until
legislation is passed to split working shifts, our only alternative is to ask
the towns to pay a higher rate. We are
working with the county to declare this a county holiday, which would give us a
chance to hire county employees as well.
We sponsored a display of the new electronic
machines from 7 different vendors.
Inspectors, machine custodians, town officials and county employees were
invited to our office to test and comment on each machine. The participants really appreciated us
bringing the machines to them and the feedback was very useful.
One major project completed in the beginning of the
year was to categorize and move our purged files to the old Library for quicker
access to current files. Having more space
allowed us to work quicker. A big
thanks to staff members Tom Paolangeli and Kate Bortz: a lot of hard work was involved.
The two Executive
Assistants continued our outreach at Ithaca High School. Kimberly Spencer and Kristie Sopp had
glowing reports from the school staff.
They also traveled to the nursing homes as mandated and have really
worked out a great schedule with the facilities. Unfortunately, because all projects and outreach coordination is
a bi-partisan team, we couldn’t spare the staff to do more.
Many of our plans are on
hold because of the lack of funding. As
soon as the funds are released for the machines and the database, major
planning will have to occur on how to run the elections, voter education, and training. A new idea that we are working on is having
a cell phone available at each polling site.
Polling sites that allow their phones to be used during the day don’t
always have phones available after 5:00 p.m.
Reaching the election inspectors is critical because of possible machine
problems or electioneering. We are
hoping that one of the cell phone companies will donate their phones and
airtime for the day. Another idea came
from Larry Roberts, the Director of the Fingerlakes Independent Center. He suggested 8 ½ x 11 magnifying glasses to
read the results correctly. The
magnifying glasses are very affordable and should make the inspector’s job
easier. The voters should find the
glasses convenient for reading the small print on the propositions. We will also be holding an Annual Custodian
Meeting to prepare for the following year’s election.
Legislative priorities for 2004
will be based on voter education, funding of county boards and inspector
retention and recruitment.
Commissioners DeWitt and Cree continue to lobby our local legislators on
beneficial improvements to elections.
We have heard responses from all our representatives and they have
commended our efforts on many occasions.
Cost saving initiatives, as always, will be a top
priority. We have already saved the
town unnecessary advertising costs. We
have changed vendors and purchased a new time clock, which will save $157/year
and paper costs of over $200/year. We
know that these are not huge amounts, but every savings adds up. Unfortunately, the Tompkins County
Legislature passed a resolution on August 5, 2003 to reduce to cost of a voter
export CD. The price dropped from
$80.00 to $5.00, significantly decreasing our potential revenue. Their solution
was to increase our budget $2,000 for 2003 only. This revenue will be extremely hard to replace in the coming
years.
2004 will present many unique challenges to our
Board. Somehow we must balance funding constraints against the increased
workload of a Federal election year and the numerous new time and resource
consuming State and Federal mandates. We will do our best to maintain our
position as one of the most innovative and best run Boards in New York State.
Respectfully submitted;
Elizabeth W. Cree Stephen
M. DeWitt
Commissioners of Elections